It's Mailbag time at Insights, where we take your comments, criticisms and e-mails and answer them or give them props in this space. Questions about football, basketball, lacrosse, soccer or anything else is fair game. Send your questions to [email protected] or leave them in comment boxes below during the week. If you do ask a question, we ask that you list your name (at least first one) and hometown. And one day, we'll enforce it, too.
On to the questions, which as always come from real readers:
Thanks for the good article on how Coach Weis can get smarter, faster. What so bothered me about CW's references to the Patriots last week was it seemed to(o) arrogant in making the hackneyed reference to his professional buddies...just how relevent (sic) to ND's challenges is yet to be seen. You wrote a nice column on this. Thanks.
-Joe Casper
Joe,
Thanks for the kind words. We disagree, though, that it is arrogant. It is him seeking out some help, which is probably a good thing.
----
You know next to nothing about football -- you write for a small town hick paper and you presume to offer Charlie Weis advice about whom he should seek out? Get over yourself!
-Michael Ahern
Michael,
Shame to hear you feel that way -- and our paper isn't a "small town hick paper." And no matter the paper I work for, part of my job is to analyze -- so I analyzed that Weis might want to talk to more than the Patriots.
----
Weis needs to talk to college. Pro style practices and all that do not work in college. There is a reason why pro coaches don't do well in college. Belichick should let him know why he failed with the Browns and tell him to let the coaches coach at ND instead of Weis trying to do everything himself.
-Mike Holmes
Mike,
Weis has for sure picked up on part of that -- he is going to make practices more physical. As for the rest of it, this is a critical offseason.
----
I think the key point is that the Patriot coaches know Charlie well enough to offer criticism. Strangers, esp. other college coaches, will be too polite.
I hope you have thick skin. Some people don't understand that part of your job is to offer opinions on Charlie's. I don't always agree with you but you have been honest and fair. Keep up the good work.
-Moose Krause
Moose,
Thanks. We've seen it over the past three weeks -- when people disagree, it can get to be an ugly, ugly place. I agree about going to the Pats. It's a smart move. And thanks for the kind words.
----
How exactly did Weis win 9 games in 2005 and 10 in 2006? Was it because Willingham and his staff did such a wonderful job of teaching people like Brady, Jeff, and Maurice the fundamentals? Look at the numbers- Weis took essentially the same team that was 6-6 in 2004 and went 9-3 in 2005- 2 of the losses were by 3 points. Brady magically went from a 50% passer in his first 2 years to a 60%+ passer in his third and fourth. Jeff S. went from a no-name receiver to one of the best in college football overnight. Surely, Weis couldn't be responsible for this. Willingham was such a great coach that his influence lasted an additional 2 years and is just now wearing off!
Weis is a NFL guy- in the pros, you don't need to block and tackle. We need a college coach like Ty! If we can't get him back, maybe we could hire you (Michael) as a consultant.
Michael, when are you going to write an article comparing Tyrone's masterful recruiting with Charlie's? That's another area where Charlie has failed- maybe you can help!
-Leahy
Leahy,
We are not discrediting Weis' performance in the past (although we will remind you that the players Weis inherited had talent and had some experience). And we sense your sarcasm, for sure. As for that article -- when Tyrone shows he can recruit as well as Charlie, we'll write it. However, don't hold your breath.
----
Mr. Rothstein,
Of course the mailbag seems to be a bit negative, but keep up the good work. I must say - I wouldn't have gone for the field goal either based on the situation/factors but hey agree to disagree. The practice observations are always interesting and I don't think you trash ND.
Keep writing and I will keep reading. Who knows, maybe you might become a fan in the process?....
-Jared
Jared,
Thanks for the kind words. We still would have kicked that field goal. As for becoming a fan...we doubt it.
----
"We believe Weis should take a few more trips to meet with others, those in the college game, to help refine his coaching"
Did you eat paint chips as a kid?
-Craig Ehlo
Craig,
Yep -- we especially like the red chips. Tasted like M&M's. Are you still bitter about Michael Jordan's shot in the playoffs? Seriously, if that's you, e-mail us at [email protected].
----
Didn't Weis go out to West Virginia this past off season?????
A lot of good that did...
-John Doe
John,
We're pretty sure he did. Doesn't mean he shouldn't go around college coaches again, though.
----
Getting NFL coaches perspective is not going to help in this situation. Wies needs to get Holtz involved with things. It would be great to have Holtz involved once again. Weis has potential to be a great coach but he can't go to the NFL for advice on the college game, it is two different styles with different approaches
-Joe L.
Joe,
Don't worry. We think he will.
----
Kansas had a shot against Missouri, who is now ranked #2 in your poll. Why do they drop below 2 loss teams?
-Jeremy M.
Jeremy,
We dropped Kansas because we think those three two-loss teams would beat the Jayhawks right now. Teams can be so fragile (witness South Florida, etc...) when they aren't used to being at the top. Va. Tech, Georgia and Oklahoma would beat the Jayhawks.
----
i honestly believe that if they played tomorrow, USC would beat every single team in front of them. that stanford loss killed them.
-Derek Schultz
Derek,
We think you might be right. It'll be interesting to see if the Trojans get to the Rose Bowl.
Thanks for the questions. We'll be back next week.
-By Michael Rothstein of The Journal Gazette